article

The Global Innovation Map in 2025: Who Is Patenting What?

Analysis of PCT 2025 international patent data: China surges, US recedes, semiconductors grow — and where does Brazil fit into this scenario?

Em março de 2026, a WIPO publicou os números consolidados do Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) para o ano de 2025 — e os dados contam uma história clara sobre para onde o mundo está direcionando seus esforços de inovação. Foram 275.900 pedidos internacionais de patente, um crescimento de 0,7% sobre 2024, marcando o segundo ano consecutivo de alta.

Mas por trás desse número agregado, há movimentos tectônicos em curso: a Ásia consolidando sua liderança, tecnologias digitais dominando o portfólio global de inovação, e um silêncio eloquente sobre a participação brasileira.

The Ranking: China in the Lead, Traditional Players in Decline

The most striking data point in the report is the continued Chinese advance. With 73.718 applications, China grew by 5,3% and accounts for more than a quarter of all PCT applications worldwide. The United States, with 52.617 applications, fell by 3,0% — its fourth consecutive year of decline. Japan (47.922, −1,0%) and Germany (16.441, −1,8%) also recorded contractions, both for the third year in a row.

CountryPCT Applications 2025Variation vs 2024
China73.718+5,3%
USA52.617−3,0%
Japan47.922−1,0%
South Korea25.016+4,9%
Germany16.441−1,8%

South Korea deserves a separate highlight: with 25.016 applications and a growth of 4,9%, the country extended its uninterrupted growth trajectory for 28 years. While mature economies fluctuate, Korea continues to expand its IP portfolio with almost mechanical consistency.

What Is Being Patented: Digital Communication and Semiconductors

The distribution by technological field confirms the centrality of the ICT sector. Digital communication leads with 11,1% of all published applications, followed by computer technology (9,6%), electrical machinery (9,0%), medical technology (6,3%), and pharmaceuticals (4,3%). Together, these five areas represent just over 40% of the total.

The most significant growth, however, came from two fronts: digital communication and semiconductors, both with a 6,1% increase. The semiconductor data is particularly revealing at a time of reconfiguration of global supply chains and massive investments in chip manufacturing in the USA, Europe, and Asia.

The statement by WIPO Director-General, Daren Tang, connects the dots: “AI is the latest engine of this growth and will increasingly transform how we innovate.” Artificial intelligence is not just another field of patenting — it is becoming the infrastructure that accelerates innovation across all other sectors.

Huawei and the Corporate Dominance of Innovation

Among companies, Huawei Technologies maintained absolute leadership with 7.523 published applications, a position it has held since 2017. Samsung Electronics (4.698), Qualcomm (3.227), LG Electronics (2.400), and Contemporary Amperex Technology (2.203) complete the top 5.

A revealing fact: 16 of the top 20 applicants are ICT companies. The four exceptions — Contemporary Amperex Technology, LG Energy Solution, Mitsubishi Electric, and Bosch — operate in energy, industry, and automotive. Global innovation is increasingly concentrated in digital technology companies.

Outside the top 10, the entry of Indian Jio Platforms with an impressive +971 additional applications compared to the previous year signals that India is emerging as a relevant player in the PCT system. Nokia Technologies (+470), NTT Docomo (+459), and Beijing Zitiao Network Technologies (+373) also rose in the rankings.

Where Is Brazil?

This is the point of most interest to those following Brazilian innovation policy. Brazil does not appear among the 5 top PCT applicants, nor is it even mentioned in WIPO’s press release — which, in itself, is already a relevant piece of information.

Estimates from previous years place Brazil in the range of 500 to 600 PCT applications per year, which would put it around the 18ª-20ª global position — behind not only the Asian and Western giants, but also countries like India, Singapore, Russia, Australia, and even Israel and Finland. For comparison, China alone files the equivalent of more than 100 times the Brazilian volume.

This gap is not just a number. It reflects:

  1. Low intensity of business R&D — Brazilian companies invest proportionally less in research than their global competitors
  2. Sectoral concentration — the Brazilian patent agenda is heavily concentrated in oil and gas (Petrobras), mining (Vale), and agribusiness (Embrapa), sectors with lower PCT patent density
  3. Low internationalization — the PCT system is the main vehicle for protecting inventions in multiple countries; low Brazilian adherence indicates that Brazilian companies innovate little for the global market

The contrast with India is instructive. Both countries had similar positions 15 years ago. While India created conditions for companies like Jio Platforms to emerge as world-class PCT applicants, Brazil remains stagnant in this indicator.

What to Expect for the Coming Years

The data trajectory suggests some consolidated trends:

  • Asia (China + Korea) will continue to expand its participation in the PCT system, driven by ICT companies and semiconductors
  • The convergence between AI and patenting is expected to accelerate — not just as a field of patenting (AI patents), but as a tool to accelerate the production of patentable innovation itself
  • Countries like India and Finland are expected to continue gaining ground, while mature economies fluctuate

For Brazil, the question remains: what will be necessary for the country to break free from the inertia of 500 annual PCT applications? The New Brazil Industry (NIB) foresees innovation goals, and INPI has been advancing in digitalization and backlog reduction. But the translation of these policies into international patents — which is where Brazilian innovation is measured on the global stage — has not yet appeared in the numbers. What tool - or set of tools - can be used to change this trajectory?

Read also:


You can get in touch to discuss this and other topics at the email [email protected]

Subscribe · Free

A monthly letter + a free IP read just for you.

Subscribe and reply to the welcome email with what you're working on. I'll send back a short, honest take on patentability or prior art.

✓ Subscribed · check your inbox
Monthly · no spam · 1-click unsubscribe
If this was useful
Newsletter · Free
Free IP read when you reply.
A monthly letter from a patent prosecutor and IP consultant at Brazil's Ministry of Health.
✓ SUBSCRIBED · check your inbox
Monthly · no spam · 1-click unsubscribe